[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
:: Volume 28, Issue 4 (winter 2018) ::
MEDICAL SCIENCES 2018, 28(4): 319-324 Back to browse issues page
Evaluation of efficacy of relationship enhancement and McMaster approach on adjustment of couples
Seyed Jamaleddin Nabavi * 1, Bagher Sanai Zaker 2, Alireza Kiyamanesh 3
1- PhD Candidate of Counselling, Department of counselling, Faculty of humanities and social science, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran , jamalnabavi@yahoo.com
2- Department of Counseling, Faculty of Psychology and Education, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
3- Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran; and Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract:   (237 Views)
Background: Concept of marital adjustment has the main role in a couple’s relationship enhancement. This research aimed to compare psycho-education (relationship enhancement) approach and McMaster approach to improve marital adjustment.
Materials and methods: Of 60 couples from 85 volunteer couples who had the criteria for research, finally, 24 couples were randomly selected and assigned in 3 groups (16 persons in each group; 8 men and 8 women). 10 sessions of psycho-education programs and McMaster approach were done in interventional groups. Control group didn’t receive any intervention. Group were evaluated in three stages: pre-test, post-test and follow up through Dyadic Adjustment Scale. Data were analyzed by analysis of variance test.
Results: Both psycho-education and McMaster approaches had significant impact on marital adjustment compared to the control group (p<0.05).
Conclusion: Marital adjustment among couples includes agreement, cohesion, satisfaction, kindness and level of stress. The agreement between the wives on important issues is critical for a good agreement and having a win-win relationship. The result of this study showed that both psycho-education programs and McMaster approach could be successful.
Keywords: Marital Adjustment, McMaster, Psycho-Education
Full-Text [PDF 150 kb]   (94 Downloads)    
Semi-pilot: Quazi-Experimental | Subject: psychology
Received: 2018/01/17 | Accepted: 2018/05/20 | Published: 2018/12/23
1. Goldenberg I, Goldenberg H, Eds. Family therapy: an overview. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole; 2008.
2. Long L, Young G, Eds. Counseling and therapy for couples. CA: Thomson Brooks-Cole Pub; 2007.
3. Gurman AS, Ed. Clinical handbook of couple therapy. NY: The Guilford Press; 2008.
4. Harford W K, Sweeper S. Trajectories of adjustment to couple relationship separation. Family Pro. 2013; 34: 519-32.
5. Benyamini Y, Gozlan M, Kokia E. Women's and men's perceptions of infertility and their associations with psychological adjustment: a dyadic approach. Br J Health Psychol. 2009;14:1-16. [DOI:10.1348/135910708X279288]
6. Kalkan M, Ersanli E. The Effects of the Marriage Enrichment Program Based on the Cognitive-Behavioral Approach on the Marital Adjustment of Couples; Educational Sciences: Theor Pract. 2008; 8: 977-986.
7. Chen Z, Tanaka N, Uji M, Hiramura H, Shikai N, Fujihara S, Kitamura T. The Role of Personalities in the Marital Adjustment of Japanese Couples. Social Behav Person. 2007;35: 561-72. [DOI:10.2224/sbp.2007.35.4.561]
8. Christensen A, Atkins DC, Yi J, Baucom DH, George WH. Couple and individual adjustment for 2 years following a randomized clinical trial comparing traditional versus integrative behavioral couple therapy. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2006;74:1180-91. [DOI:10.1037/0022-006X.74.6.1180]
9. Stanford K, Wolfe KL. What married couples want from each other during conflicts: an investigation of underlying concerns. J Consult Clin Psychol 2013;32: 674-99.
10. Tuzer V, Tuncel A, Goka S, Dogan Bulut S, Yuksel FV, Atan A, et al. Marital adjustment and emotional symptoms in infertile couples: gender differences. Turkish J Med Sci. 2010;40: 229-237.
11. Kim Y, Kashy DA, Wellisch DK, Spillers RL, Kaw CK, Smith TG. Quality of Life of Couples Dealing with Cancer: Dyadic and Individual Adjustment among Breast and Prostate Cancer Survivors and Their Spousal Caregivers. Ann Behav Med. 2008;35:230-38. [DOI:10.1007/s12160-008-9026-y]
12. Lundblad A, Hansson K. Outcomes in Couple Therapy: Reduced Psychiatric Symptoms and Improved Sense of Coherence. Nord J Psychiatry. 2005;59:374-80. [DOI:10.1080/08039480500319795]
13. Kinunnen U, Feldt T. Economic stress and marital adjustment among couples: analyses at the dyadic level. Eur J Social Psychol. 2004;34: 519–532. [DOI:10.1002/ejsp.213]
14. Olson DH. (). Circumplex model of marital and family systems. J Marital Fam Ther. 2012;38:105-16.
15. Langer SL, Yi JC, Storer BE, Syrjala KL. Marital adjustment, satisfaction and dissolution among hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients and spouses: a prospective, five-year longitudinal investigation. Psychooncology. 2010;19:190-200. [DOI:10.1002/pon.1542]
16. Solomon Z, Dekel R, Zerach G. Posttraumatic stress disorder and marital adjustment: the mediating role of forgiveness. Fam Process. 2009;48:546-58. [DOI:10.1111/j.1545-5300.2009.01301.x]
17. Risdal G, Singer HS. Marital adjustment in parents of children with disabilities: A historical review and meta-analysis. Res Pract Persons Severe Disabl. 2004; 29: 95-103. [DOI:10.2511/rpsd.29.2.95]
18. Spanier GB, Thompson L. A confirmatory factor analysis of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale. J Marital Fam 1982;44: 731-738. [DOI:10.2307/351593]
19. Greef AP. Characteristics of families that function well. J Fam Issu. 2000;21: 948-963. [DOI:10.1177/019251300021008001]
20. Ryan C, Gottman J. The effectiveness of the art and science of love, a workshop for couples, 1999-2003. 2003. [Unpublished manuscript]
21. Berger R, Hannah MT, Eds. Pereventive approaches in couple therapy. Lillington, NY: Taylor & Francis; 1999.
22. Gordon JM, Ed. What predicts divorce? A relationship between marital processes and marital outcomes. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1999.
23. Scuka R. The radical nature of relationship enhancement expressive skill and its implications for therapy and psychoeducation. Fam J 2004 19: 30 – 35. [DOI:10.1177/1066480710387491]
24. Mollazadeh J. Method of challenging and marital adjustment on shahid children. Psychology 2002;3:255-75.
25. Boostanipoor A. Comparing effects of psycho-education programme and systems-centered group counseling on adjustment and cohesion of couples [PhD dissertation]. Tehran: Faculty of Psychology and Education, Kharazmi University; 2013.
26. Oraki M. Effects of relationship enhancement plan training on rate of married students of marital adjustment. Social Cognitive 2012; 2:52-61.
27. Halford WK, Sweeper S. Trajectories of adjustment to couple relationship separation. Fam Proc. 2013;34: 519-532. [DOI:10.1111/famp.12006]
28. Tilden T, Gude T, Hoffart A, Sexton H. Individual distress and dyadic adjustment over a three-year follow-up period in couple therapy: a bi-directional relationship? J Fam Therapy. 2010;32: 119-141 [DOI:10.1111/j.1467-6427.2010.00490.x]
29. Kristin LM, Neena M. Marital conflict typology and children's appraisals: The moderating role of family cohesion. J Fam Psychol. 2011;25: 194-201. [DOI:10.1037/a0022888]
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:


XML   Persian Abstract   Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Nabavi S J, Sanai Zaker B, kiyamanesh A. Evaluation of efficacy of relationship enhancement and McMaster approach on adjustment of couples . MEDICAL SCIENCES. 2018; 28 (4) :319-324
URL: http://tmuj.iautmu.ac.ir/article-1-1493-en.html

Volume 28, Issue 4 (winter 2018) Back to browse issues page
فصلنامه علوم پزشکی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد پزشکی تهران Medical Science Journal of Islamic Azad Univesity - Tehran Medical Branch
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.06 seconds with 32 queries by YEKTAWEB 3855