1. 1. Biswas S, Bindra M, Jain V, Gokhale P. Evaluation of imprecision, bias and total error of clinical chemistry analysers. Ind J Clin Biochem 2015;30:104-8. [DOI:10.1007/s12291-014-0448-y]

2. Lumsden J. Laboratory test method validation. Rev Med Veterinaire 2000;151:623-30.

3. Theodorsson E, Magnusson B, Leito I. Bias in clinical chemistry. Bioanalysis 2014;6:2855-75. [DOI:10.4155/bio.14.249]

4. McGuinness C, Seccombe DW, Frohlich JJ, Ehnholm C, Sundvall J, Steiner G, et al. Laboratory standardization of a large international clinical trial: the DAIS experience. Clin Biochem 2000;33:15-24. [DOI:10.1016/S0009-9120(99)00081-8]

5. Theodorsson E. Quality assurance in clinical chemistry: a touch of statistics and a lot of common sense. J Med Biochem 2016;35:103-12. [DOI:10.1515/jomb-2016-0012]

6. McPherson RA, Pincus MR, Editors. Henry's clinical diagnosis and management by laboratory methods E-book. New York: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2017.

7. Hens K, Berth M, Armbruster D, Westgard S. Sigma metrics used to assess analytical quality of clinical chemistry assays: importance of the allowable total error (TEa) target. Clin Chem Lab Med 2014;52:973-80. [DOI:10.1515/cclm-2013-1090]

8. Westgard J. CLIA Requirements for Analytical Quality. Avialable from: https://www.westgard.com/clia.htm. [Accessed at: 2019]

9. Jegede FE, Mbah HA, Aminu M, Yakubu TN, Torpey K. Evaluation of laboratory performance with quality indicators in infectious disease hospital, Kano, Nigeria. Open J Clin Diag 2015;5:1. [DOI:10.4236/ojcd.2015.51001]

10. Guo X, Zhang T, Gao X, Li PTY, Wu Q, Wu J, et al. Sigma metrics for assessing the analytical quality of clinical chemistry assays: a comparison of two approaches. Biochem Med 2018;28:204-14. [DOI:10.11613/BM.2018.020708]

11. Chaudhary NG, Patani SS, Sharma H, Maheshwari A, Jadhav PM, Maniar MA. Application of six sigma for the quality assurance in clinical biochemistry laboratory-a retrospective study. Int J Res Med 2013;2:17-20.

12. Westgard JO, Westgard SA. Assessing quality on the Sigma scale from proficiency testing and external quality assessment surveys. Clin Chem Lab Med 2015;53:1531-5. [DOI:10.1515/cclm-2014-1241]

13. Huysal K, Budak YU. Application of sigma metrics for the assessment of quality assurance using the MQ-2000 PT HbA1c analyzer. Biochem Med 2015;25:416-20. [DOI:10.11613/BM.2015.042]

14. Westgard JO, Westgard SA. An assessment of σ metrics for analytic quality using performance data from proficiency testing surveys and the CLIA criteria for acceptable performance. Am J Clin Pathol 2006;125:343-54. [DOI:10.1309/V50H4FRVVWX12C79]

15. Mohammadi R, Norozi V. HbA1c External Quality Assessment: Commutable vs Noncommutable Samples. Biomed Pharmacol J 2016;9:163-8. [DOI:10.13005/bpj/923]

16. Miller WG. Specimen materials, target values and commutability for external quality assessment (proficiency testing) schemes. Clin Chim Acta 2003;327:25-37. [DOI:10.1016/S0009-8981(02)00370-4]

17. Sudhakar B, Reddy AS, Fallerio J. Comparison of three methods for measurement of blood HbA1c as to reliability. Int J Bioassays 2014;3:3000-4.

18. Mao X, Shao J, Zhang B, Wang Y. Evaluating analytical quality in clinical biochemistry laboratory using Six Sigma. Biochem Med 2018;28:253-56. [DOI:10.11613/BM.2018.020904]