[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Aims& Scopes
Journal News
Articles archive::
Current Issue
All Issues
For Authors::
Call for Papers
Submission Instruction
Submission Form
For Reviewers::
Reviewers Section
Registration::
Registration Information
Registration Form
Contact us::
Contact Information
Contact us
Site Facilities::
Site map
Search contents
FAQ
Top 10 contents
Inform to friends
Webmail::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 31, Issue 4 (WINTER 2021) ::
MEDICAL SCIENCES 2021, 31(4): 450-458 Back to browse issues page
Psychometrics of the self-efficacy instrument of clean intermittent urinary catheterization in patients with neural bladder admitted to rehabilitation hospitals in Tehran in 2019
Afsaneh Mostagim Ahmadabadi1 , Faezeh Sahbaeiroy 2, Shirin Hejazi1
1- Department of Nursing, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2- Department of Nursing, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran , fsahbaei@sbmu.ac.ir
Abstract:   (1786 Views)
Background: The incidence of neural bladder is increasing today and these people need catheterization. Intermittent clean urinary catheterization is a low-risk method for the patients.
Materials and methods: This was a descriptive methodological and validation research. For content validity, 10 people were selected by purposive method. For face validity, 25 people were chosen by convenience method Aimed at structural validity, gradual method was used from sounding conductors. For the reliability of the questionnaire, 10 people completed the questionnaire.
Results: First, a draft was developed and two qualitative and quantitative methods were used for face validity. The effect scores of the items were not less than 1.5. None of the items less than 62% were deleted according to the table. In construct validity, exploratory factor analysis and varimax rotation methods were used and the adequacy of sample size was 0.78 by KMO test, and the results of Bartlett sphericity test were significant (4017/486 p <0.001). 5 items with a share of less than 0.4 were removed and factor analysis was performed again and the number of factors was reduced to four with a variance of 40.136. The results of internal consistency of Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the whole questionnaire with 32 items were equal to 0.862 and 0.859 for women and men respectively. The results of the stability of the verification tools and the result of the ICC test (0.949) showed a good correlation coefficient for each structure.
Conclusion: The tools designed in this study are valid and reliable and can be used in various studies.
Keywords: Psychometrics, Clean intermittent urinary catheterization self-efficacy instrument, Patients with neural bladder.
Full-Text [PDF 342 kb]   (915 Downloads)    
Semi-pilot: Survey/Cross Sectional/Descriptive | Subject: Nursing
Received: 2021/02/24 | Accepted: 2021/10/6
References
1. Panicker, J. N. Fowler,CJ. Kessler,TM., et al . "Lower urinary tract dysfunction in the neurological patient: clinical assessment and management." The Lancet Neurology.2015;14(7): 720-732. [DOI:10.1016/S1474-4422(15)00070-8]
2. Dorsher, P. T.McIntosh, P. M . "Neurogenic bladder." Adv Urol 2012: 816274. [DOI:10.1155/2012/816274]
3. Weber, DJ. Sickbert,B. Gould, C. V. Incidence of catheter-associated and non-catheter-associated urinary tract infections in a healthcare system.Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.2011;32(8),822-823. [DOI:10.1086/661107]
4. Geng V, Cobussen-Boekhorst H, Farrell M, Gea-Sánchez I, Pearce T, Schwennesen S, et al. Catheterisation: indwelling catheters in adults . Arnhem (NL): European Association of Urology Nurses; 2018.
5. Mahajan ST, Frasure HE, Marrie RA. The prevalence of urinary catheterization in women and men with multiple sclerosis. J Spinal Cord Med. 2013;36(6):632-7. [DOI:10.1179/2045772312Y.0000000084]
6. Przydacz, M. Denys,p. corcos,J . "What do we know about neurogenic bladder prevalence and management in developing countries and emerging regions of the world?" Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine.2017 ;60(5): 341-346. [DOI:10.1016/j.rehab.2017.02.008]
7. Feneley, R. C.Hopley, I. B. Wells, P. N. et al . "Urinary catheters: history, current status, adverse events and research agenda." J Med Eng Techno.2015;l39(8): 459-470. [DOI:10.3109/03091902.2015.1085600]
8. Centers for Disease Control Prevention . Urinary tract infection (catheter-associated urinary tract infection and non-catheter-associated urinary tract infection and other urinary system infection events.2015.
9. Rezai, M.S. Bagheri ,N.M. Nikkhah, A. Catheter-related urinary nosocomial infections in intensive care units: An epidemiologic study in North of IranCaspian journal of internal medicine.2017;8(2):76.
10. Ginsberg D, Gousse A, Keppenne V, et al. Phase 3 efficacy and tolerability study of onabotulinumtoxinA for urinary incontinence from neurogenic detrusor overactivity. J Urol. 2012;187:2131-2139. [DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2012.01.125]
11. Vahr S, Cobussen-Boekhorst H, Eikenboom J, Geng V, Holroyd S, Lester M, et al. Catheterisation: urethral intermittent in adults . Arnhem (NL): European Association of Urology Nurses; 2013. http://patients.uroweb.org .
12. Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care. Health data branch web portal: Ontario case costing. Toronto (ON): Queen's Printer for Ontario; 2018.
13. Bermingham SL, Hodgkinson S, Wright S, et al. Intermittent self catheterisation with hydrophilic, gel reservoir, and non-coated catheters: a systematic review and cost effectiveness analysis. BMJ. 2013;346:e8639. [DOI:10.1136/bmj.e8639]
14. Skelly J, Eyles P, Hilts L, Worral J, Campbell L, North J. Intermittent self-catheterization: a guide for men and women [Internet]. Hamilton: Canadian Nurse Continence Advisors; c1986-2016.
15. Henseler, J.; Ringle, C.M.; Sarstedt, M. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2015, 43, 115-135. [DOI:10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8]
16. Streiner, D. L., Norman, G. R., & Cairney, J.(2015) Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use. USA: Oxford University Press. [DOI:10.1093/med/9780199685219.001.0001]
17. Mohammadbeigi, A. Mohammadsalehi, N. Aligol, M.(2015)Validity and Reliability of the Instruments and Types of MeasurmentS in Health Applied Researches. Journal of Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences ;13:1153-1170.
18. Baghernejad Hamzekolayee, Qamar. Sahbaeiroy,Faezeh. Zare, Mohammad (2018)
19. Design and Psychometric of Smoking Cessation Instrument according to Precaution Adoption Process Model in Patients Hospitalized in Hospitals Affiliated to Medical University of Babol, Iran, during 2017. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutics • Jan-Mar 2018 (Suppl) • 12 (1) | S356- S363.
20. Diem KG. A(2016) step-by-step guide to developing effective questionnaires and survey procedures for program evaluation & research. Rutgers Cooperative Research & Extension, NJAES, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey Retrieved from University of Canberra E-reserve 2004 Available from:www.rce.rutgers.edu/evaluation
21. Sahbaeiroy , Faezeh . Ramezankhani, Ali. Alhani ,Fatemeh(2016) Explanation of Pharmaceutical Care of Cardiovascular Patients Hospitalized
22. in Hospitals Affiliated with Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences. Int. J. Pharm. Res. Allied Sci., 2016, 5(3):277-283.
23. Speyer R, Cordier R, Kertscher B, Heijnen BJ.(2014) Psychometric properties of questionnaires on functional health status in oropharyngeal dysphagia: a systematic literature review. BioMed Research International . http://www.hindawi.com/journals/bmri/2014/458678/a. [DOI:10.1155/2014/458678]
24. Pournorooz, Neda. Sahbaeiroy,Faezeh. Zare, Mohammad (2018)
25. EFFECTS OF SELF-CARE TRAINING ON MS PATIENTS' HOPE RATE BY GROUP DISCUSSION. Pharmacophore, 8(5) 2017, Pages 65-69.
26. Dolatyaree A, Sharififar S, Zareian A, Tadrisi SD.(2015) Translation and validation of family satisfaction questionnaire of adult patients hospitalized in Intensive Care Units. Journal of Critical Care Nursing ;8:59-68.
27. Panicker JN, Fowler CJ, Kessler TM. Lower urinary tract dysfunction in the neurological patient: clinical assessment and management. Lancet Neurol 2015;14:720-32. [DOI:10.1016/S1474-4422(15)00070-8]
28. Dorsher PT, McIntosh PM. Neurogenic bladder. Adv Urol 2012;2012: 816274. [DOI:10.1155/2012/816274]
29. Weber DJ, Sickbert-Bennett EE, Gould CV, Brown VM, Huslage K, Rutala WA. Incidence of catheter-associated and non-catheter-associated urinary tract infections in a healthcare system. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2011;32:822-3. [DOI:10.1086/661107]
30. Geng V, Cobussen-Boekhorst H, Farrell M, Gea-Sánchez I, Pearce T, Schwennesen S, et al, Editors. Evidence-based Guidelines for Best Practice in Urological Health Care. Catheterisation: indwelling catheters in adults. Arnhem (NL): European Association of Urology Nurses; 2018.
31. Mahajan ST, Frasure HE, Marrie RA. The prevalence of urinary catheterization in women and men with multiple sclerosis. J Spinal Cord Med 2013;36:632-7. [DOI:10.1179/2045772312Y.0000000084]
32. Przydacz M, Denys P, Corcos J. What do we know about neurogenic bladder prevalence and management in developing countries and emerging regions of the world? Ann Phys Rehabil Med 2017 ;60:341-346. [DOI:10.1016/j.rehab.2017.02.008]
33. Feneley RC, Hopley IB, Wells PN. Urinary catheters: history, current status, adverse events and research agenda. J Med Eng Technol 2015;39:459-70. [DOI:10.3109/03091902.2015.1085600]
34. Centers for Disease Control Prevention. Urinary tract infection (catheter-associated urinary tract infection and non-catheter-associated urinary tract infection and other urinary system infection) events. Atlanta, GA: CDC; 2015.
35. Rezai MS, Bagheri-Nesami M, Nikkhah A. Catheter-related urinary nosocomial infections in intensive care units: An epidemiologic study in North of Iran. Caspian J Intern Med 2017;8:76-82.
36. Ginsberg D, Gousse A, Keppenne V, Sievert KD, Thompson C, Lam W, et al. Phase 3 efficacy and tolerability study of onabotulinumtoxinA for urinary incontinence from neurogenic detrusor overactivity. J Urol 2012;187:2131-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2012.01.125]
37. Vahr S, Cobussen-Boekhorst H, Eikenboom J, Geng V, Holroyd S, Lester M, et al. Catheterisation: urethral intermittent in adults. Arnhem (NL): European Association of Urology Nurses; 2013.
38. Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care. Health data branch web portal: Ontario case costing. Toronto (ON): Queen's Printer for Ontario; 2018.
39. Bermingham SL, Hodgkinson S, Wright S, Hayter E, Spinks J, Pellowe C. Intermittent self catheterisation with hydrophilic, gel reservoir, and non-coated catheters: a systematic review and cost effectiveness analysis. BMJ. 2013; 346: e8639. [DOI:10.1136/bmj.e8639]
40. Skelly J, Eyles P, Hilts L, Worral J, Campbell L, North J. Intermittent self-catheterization: a guide for men and women [Internet]. Hamilton: Canadian Nurse Continence Advisors; c1986-2016.
41. Henseler J, Ringle C.M, Sarstedt M. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. J Acad Mark Sci 2015;43:115-35. [DOI:10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8]
42. Mokkink LB, Prinsen CA, Bouter LM, Vet HC, Terwee CB. The Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and how to select an outcome measurement instrument. Braz J Phys Ther 2016;20:105-113. [DOI:10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0143]
43. Llewellyn, Ellardus. Van, Zyl. Rothmann, Sebastiaan. Positive Psychological Intervention Design and Protocols for Multi-Cultural Contexts. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature Switzerland; 2018.
44. Bonett DG, Wright TA. Cronbach's alpha reliability: Interval estimation, hypothesis testing, and sample size planning. J Organiz Behav 2015;36:3-15. [DOI:10.1002/job.1960]
45. Allame Z, Heydarinasab L, Fasanghari M, Shahmohammadi M. Examination of the Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of the Multidimensional Orientation Toward Dying and Death Inventory Among Students. Pract Clin Psychol 2018; 7: 291-302. [DOI:10.32598/jpcp.7.4.291]
46. Zyl LEV, Efendic E, Rothmann S, Shankland R. Best-practice guidelines for positive psychological intervention research design. Cham, Switzerland; Springer Nature Switzerland AG; 2019.
47. Souza AC, Alexandre NMC, Guirardello EB. Psychometric properties in instruments evaluation of reliability and validity. Epidemiol Serv Saude 2017;26:649-59. [DOI:10.5123/S1679-49742017000300022]
48. Heale R, Twycross A, Validity and reliability in quantitative studies. Evid Based Nurs 2015;18:66-7. [DOI:10.1136/eb-2015-102129]
49. Streiner D L, Norman G R, Cairney J. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. USA: Oxford University Press; 2015. [DOI:10.1093/med/9780199685219.001.0001]
50. Vakili MM, Jahangiri N. Content Validity and Reliability of the Measurement Tools in Educational, Behavioral, and Health Sciences Research. J Med Educ Dev 2018; 10:105-117. [DOI:10.29252/edcj.10.28.106]
51. Mohammadbeigi A, Mohammadsalehi N, Aligol M. Validity and Reliability of the Instruments and Types of MeasurmentS in Health Applied Researches. Journal of Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences (JRUMS). 2015;13:1153-1170. [In Persian]
52. Diem KG. A step-by-step guide to developing effective questionnaires and survey procedures for program evaluation & research. Rutgers Cooperative Research & Extension, NJAES, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey Retrieved from University of Canberra E-reserve 2016. Available from:www.rce.rutgers.edu/evaluation. http://orsp.rutgers.edu/humans1.html.
53. Sahbaeiroy F, Ramezankhani A, Alhani F. Explanation of Pharmaceutical Care of Cardiovascular Patients Hospitalized in Hospitals Affiliated with Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences. Int J Pharm Res Allied Sci 2016, 5:277-283.
54. Speyer R, Cordier R, Kertscher B, Heijnen BJ. Psychometric properties of questionnaires on functional health status in oropharyngeal dysphagia: a systematic literature review. Biomed Res Int 2014;2014:458678. [DOI:10.1155/2014/458678]
55. Moon S, Kim DH, Kim EJ, Kim YJ, Lee S. Evaluation of the validity and reliability of the Korean version of the Nursing Professional Values Scale-Revised. Nurse Educ Today 2014;34:325-30. [DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2013.06.014]
56. Demetrovics Z, Kiraly O, Koronczai B, Griffiths MD, Nagygyorgy K, Elekes Z, et al. Psychometric properties of the problematic internet use questionnaire Short-Form (PIUQ-SF-6) in a nationally representative sample of adolescents. PLoS ONE 2016: 11: e0159409. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0159409]
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA

XML   Persian Abstract   Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Mostagim Ahmadabadi A, Sahbaeiroy F, Hejazi S. Psychometrics of the self-efficacy instrument of clean intermittent urinary catheterization in patients with neural bladder admitted to rehabilitation hospitals in Tehran in 2019. MEDICAL SCIENCES 2021; 31 (4) :450-458
URL: http://tmuj.iautmu.ac.ir/article-1-1868-en.html
Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 31, Issue 4 (WINTER 2021) Back to browse issues page
فصلنامه علوم پزشکی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد پزشکی تهران Medical Science Journal of Islamic Azad Univesity - Tehran Medical Branch
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4660