[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
Webmail::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 36, Issue 3 (Fall 2026) ::
MEDICAL SCIENCES 2026, 36(3): 383-390 Back to browse issues page
Risk factors associated with ectopic pregnancy: a case-control study in Qom, Iran with emphasis on reproductive health and population policy
Fatemeh Ghodsi1 , Leila Arbil *2 , Arefeh Nazari2 , Leila Safdari2
1- Department of Midwifery, QoMS.C, Islamic Azad University, Qom, Iran & leilaarbil16991699@gmail.com
2- Department of Midwifery, QoMS.C, Islamic Azad University, Qom, Iran
Abstract:   (249 Views)
Background: Ectopic pregnancy is one of the most important causes of maternal mortality and loss of fertility in women. The aim of this study was to investigate the factors associated with ectopic pregnancy and its impact on reproductive health and population growth policies in Qom Province.
Materials and methods: This case–control study was conducted in 2020 using a census method in Shahid Beheshti and Farghani Hospitals in Qom City. Pregnant women who were hospitalized with suspected ectopic pregnancy and acute abdomen and subsequently received a confirmed diagnosis were included in the case group. Women with normal intrauterine pregnancies were randomly assigned to the control group. Demographic data and medical history, including smoking, history of abortion, pelvic infections, and previous ectopic pregnancy, were extracted from patients’ medical records.
Results: A total of 147 women were studied in each group. The findings indicated that cesarean delivery, use of intrauterine devices (IUDs) and oral contraceptives, history of ectopic pregnancy, pelvic inflammatory disease, and level of education were significant factors associated with ectopic pregnancy. In contrast, age, history of abdominal or pelvic surgery, number of pregnancies, and history of abortion showed no significant association with this complication.
Conclusion: The results demonstrated that reproductive lifestyle, contraceptive methods, and mode of delivery play a crucial role in the occurrence of ectopic pregnancy in Qom Province. Therefore, proper implementation of the Ministry of Health’s population growth policies and promotion of physiological childbirth may reduce the incidence of this condition and improve reproductive health.
 
Keywords: Ectopic pregnancy, Contraceptive methods, Pelvic inflammatory disease, Infertility, Abortion
Full-Text [PDF 946 kb]   (113 Downloads)    
Semi-pilot: case-control | Subject: Midwifery
Received: 2025/07/15 | Accepted: 2025/12/21 | Published: 2026/09/1
References
1. Asnafi N, Hajian K, Shahriyari M, Taheri B. Risk factors in ectopic pregnancy: a case - control study. J Gorgan Univ Med Sci 2012;14:52-57. [In Persian]
2. Kronenberg HM, ed. Williams Textbook of Endocrinology. E-Book. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2022.
3. Hashemi Jam MS, Matin S, Saremi A. Evaluation of 5-year Ectopic Pregnancy Patients Treated with Matrix Methotrexate and Operating Room of Sarem Specialty Hospital. Sarem Journal of Medical Research 2022;7:81-6. [In Persian] [DOI:10.61186/sjrm.7.2.81]
4. Panelli DM, Phillips CH, Brady PC. Incidence, diagnosis and management of tubal and nontubal ectopic pregnancies: a review. Fertil Res Pract 2015;1:1-20. [DOI:10.1186/s40738-015-0008-z]
5. Raine-Bennett T, Fassett MJ, Chandra M, Armstrong MA, Shi JM, Chiu VY, et al. Ectopic pregnancy prevention: Further evidence of benefits of prescription contraceptives. Contraception 2022;105:19-25. [DOI:10.1016/j.contraception.2021.09.007]
6. Khan KS, Wojdyla D, Say L, Gülmezoglu AM, Van Look PF. WHO analysis of causes of maternal death: a systematic review. Lancet 2006;367:1066-74. [DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68397-9]
7. Barghdoust HR, taghavi zahed kolaie A, saeednia S. Risk factors assoicated with increased the chance of ectopic pregnancy. Koomesh. 2021;23:e153280. [DOI:10.52547/koomesh.23.4.502]
8. Bouyer J, Coste J, Fernandez H, Pouly J-L, Job-Spira N. Sites of ectopic pregnancy: a 10 year population-based study of 1800 cases. Human Reprod 2002;17:3224-30. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/17.12.3224]
9. Mashadi E, Mashadi S. A case report of advanced abdominal pregnancy. J Arak Uni Med Sci 2007;10:97-101. [In Persian]
10. Asah-Opoku K, Oppong SA, Ameme DK, Nuamah MA, Mumuni K, Yeboah AO, et al. Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy among pregnant women attending a tertiary healthcare facility in Accra, Ghana. Int J Gynecol Obstetr 2019;147:120-25. [DOI:10.1002/ijgo.12928]
11. Jin X-Y, Li C, Xu W, Liu L, Wei M-L, Fei H-Y, et al. Factors associated with the incidence of ectopic pregnancy in women undergoing assisted reproductive treatment. Chin Med J (Engl) 2020;133:2054-60. [DOI:10.1097/CM9.0000000000001058]
12. Wang X, Huang L, Yu Y, Xu S, Lai Y, Zeng W. Risk factors and clinical characteristics of recurrent ectopic pregnancy: A case-control study. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2020;46:1098-103. [DOI:10.1111/jog.14253]
13. Peivandi S, Habibi A. Factors associated with ruptured ectopic pregnancy: a systematic review. IJOGI 2023;26:70-79. [In Persian]
14. Hwang A, Chou L, Islam M, Li Y-C, Syed-Abdul S. Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy in the Taiwanese population: a retrospective observational study. Arch Gynecol Obstetr 2016;294:779-83. [DOI:10.1007/s00404-016-4117-7]
15. Coste J, Job-Spira N, Fernandez H, Papiemik E, Spira A. Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy: a case-control study in France, with special focus on infectious factors. Am J Epidemiol 1991;133:839-49. [DOI:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115964]
16. Okmen F, Zeybek B, Akdemir A, Ergenoglu AM, Yeniel O. Is there a relationship between age and side dominance of tubal ectopic pregnancies?-A preliminary report. Ginekol Pol 2014;85:677-81. [DOI:10.17772/gp/1791]
17. Barnhart KT, Sammel MD, Gracia CR, Chittams J, Hummel AC, Shaunik A. Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy in women with symptomatic first-trimester pregnancies. Fertil Steril 2006;86:36-43. [DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.12.023]
18. Baser A, Mahajan V. Evaluation of the Adnexa. Obstet Gynecol Ultra Begin 2019;216.
19. Nankali A, Shirzadi N, Rezaei M, Daeichin S. Trends in the Treatment and Clinical Presentations of Tubal Ectopic Pregnancy in Imam Reza Hospital of Kermanshah, Iran (2007-2011). The Iranian Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Infertility 2014;17:1-7. [In Persian]
20. Ayaz A, Emam S, Farooq MU. Clinical course of ectopic pregnancy: A single-center experience. J Human Reprod Sci 2013;6:70-73. [DOI:10.4103/0974-1208.112386]
21. Majhi AK, Roy N, Karmakar KS, Banerjee PK. Ectopic pregnancy--an analysis of 180 cases. J Indian Med Assoc 2007;105:308, 310, 31212 passim.
22. Li C, Zhao W-H, Zhu Q, Cao S-J, Ping H, Xi X, et al. Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy: a multi-center case-control study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2015;15:1-9. [DOI:10.1186/s12884-015-0613-1]
23. Karaer A, Avsar FA, Batioglu S. Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy: A case‐control study. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2006;46(6):521-7. [DOI:10.1111/j.1479-828X.2006.00653.x]
24. Bouyer J, Coste J, Shojaei T, Pouly J-L, Fernandez H, Gerbaud L, et al. Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy: a comprehensive analysis based on a large case-control, population-based study in France. Am J Epidemiol 2003;157:185-94. [DOI:10.1093/aje/kwf190]
25. Holland MG, Bienstock JL. Recurrent ectopic pregnancy in a cesarean scar. Obstetr Gynecol 2008;111:541-5. [DOI:10.1097/01.AOG.0000287295.39149.bd]
26. Weström L, Bengtsson LP, Mårdh P. Incidence, trends, and risks of ectopic pregnancy in a population of women. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1981;282:15-18. [DOI:10.1136/bmj.282.6257.15]
27. Tan Y, Bu Z-q, Shi H, Song H, Zhang Y-l. Risk factors of recurrent ectopic pregnancy in patients treated with in vitro fertilization cycles: a matched case-control study. Front Endocrinol 2020;11:552117. [DOI:10.3389/fendo.2020.552117]
28. Jacob L, Kalder M, Kostev K. Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy in Germany: a retrospective study of 100,197 patients. Ger Med Sci 2017;15:Doc9.
29. Zhang Y, Chen J, Lu W, Li B, Du G, Wan X. Clinical characteristics of persistent ectopic pregnancy after salpingostomy and influence on ongoing pregnancy. J Obstetr Gynaecol Res 2017;43:564-70. [DOI:10.1111/jog.13251]
30. Zhang B, Cui L, Tang R, Ding L, Yan L, Chen Z-J. Reduced ectopic pregnancy rate on day 5 embryo transfer compared with day 3: a meta-analysis. PloS One 2017;12:e0169837. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0169837]
31. Lotfian N, Talaei BA, Rahmani BM, Daiemi M, Rahmani BR. Ovarian ectopic pregnancy: a rare case report. Scientific Information Database 2017;21:1142-48.
32. Sohail N, Tayyab M, Iqbal F, Butt Maria NA. Tubal ectopic pregnancy, management in a tertiary care hospital. Pak J Med Health Sci 2010;4:472-75.
Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Ghodsi F, Arbil L, Nazari A, Safdari L. Risk factors associated with ectopic pregnancy: a case-control study in Qom, Iran with emphasis on reproductive health and population policy. MEDICAL SCIENCES 2026; 36 (3) :383-390
URL: http://tmuj.iautmu.ac.ir/article-1-2403-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 36, Issue 3 (Fall 2026) Back to browse issues page
فصلنامه علوم پزشکی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد پزشکی تهران Medical Science Journal of Islamic Azad Univesity - Tehran Medical Branch
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.13 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4774