[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Aims& Scopes
Journal News
Articles archive::
Current Issue
All Issues
For Authors::
Call for Papers
Submission Instruction
Submission Form
For Reviewers::
Reviewers Section
Registration::
Registration Information
Registration Form
Contact us::
Contact Information
Contact us
Site Facilities::
Site map
Search contents
FAQ
Top 10 contents
Inform to friends
Webmail::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 33, Issue 4 (winter 2023) ::
MEDICAL SCIENCES 2023, 33(4): 414-425 Back to browse issues page
Designing a hospital performance evaluation model based on qualitative components (A case study of Shiraz Hospitals based on professional ethics)
Mehdi Golrizkhatami1 , Morteza Shafiee 2, Amir Kazemi3
1- Student in Cultural Management and Planning, Department of Cultural Management and Planning, Economics and Management Faculty, Shiraz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz, Iran -Student in Cultural Management and Planning, Department of Cultural Management and Planning, Fars Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Fars, Iran
2- Department of Industrial Management, Economics and Management Faculty, Shiraz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz, Iran , morteza.shafiee80@yahoo.com
3- Department of Management, Economics and Management Faculty, Shiraz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz, Iran
Abstract:   (283 Views)
Background: One of the most complex decision-making problems of medical managers is evaluating the performance of hospitals. The problem starts from the fact that only the quantity is the basis of the decision. Designing a mathematical solution for the evaluation of qualitative components by choosing medical professional ethics, solves the evaluation gap in the therapeutic environment with qualitative components, which we have discussed in this research.
Materials and methods: By combining 4 models of DEA, DEA and BSC simultaneously and the evaluation laboratory and decision test, efforts have been made to reach a standard model in a period of 8 months. The quantitative population is all the doctors of 37 private and public hospitals in Shiraz City, 378 people were selected as a sample.
Results: The findings showed that the mean professional ethics in the education and growth sector was equal to 84.73%, in the internal processes sector it was equal to 92.09%, in the financial sector it was equal to 95.81% and finally in the service recipient sector it was equal to 100%. Also, hospitals 1, 3, 5, 8, 12, 13, 17, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 35, 36 and 37 are efficient and others are ineffective.
Conclusion: In the evaluation, no significant difference was observed between public and private hospitals in respect of professional ethics. Also, the designed model showed that hospitals that are efficient will ultimately lead to an increase in the overall efficiency of the organizational system and better service to patients.
 
Keywords: Performance evaluation, Hospital, Professional ethics
Full-Text [PDF 420 kb]   (130 Downloads)    
Semi-pilot: Qualitative | Subject: Health Information Management
Received: 2023/05/8 | Accepted: 2023/06/10 | Published: 2023/12/1
References
1. Zhang Y, Li L. Study on Balanced Scorecard of Commercial Bank in Performance Management System. Proceedings of the 2009 International Symposium on Web Information Systems and Applications. China, Academy Publisher, 2009; 206-209.
2. Chi Sun C. A performance evaluation model by integrating fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods. Expert Sys App 2010; 7745:37. [DOI:10.1016/j.eswa.2010.04.066]
3. Ghalayini AM, Noble J.S. The changing basis of performance measurement. Int J Oper Prod 1996; 16: 63-80. [DOI:10.1108/01443579610125787]
4. Neely A, Bourne M. Why measurement initiatives fail. Measuring Business Excellence 2000;4: 3-7. [DOI:10.1108/13683040010362283]
5. Creamer G, Freund Y. Learning a board Balanced Scorecard to improve corporate performance. Decis Support Syst 2010; 49: 365-85. [DOI:10.1016/j.dss.2010.04.004]
6. Kraus K, Lind J. The impact of the corporate balanced scorecard on corporate control A research note. Manag Account Res 2010;21: 265-77. [DOI:10.1016/j.mar.2010.08.001]
7. Huang H.C. Designing a knowledge-based system for strategic planning: A balanced scorecard perspective. Expert Sys App 2009;36: 209-18. [DOI:10.1016/j.eswa.2007.09.046]
8. Kaplan R.S, Norton D. Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system. Harvard Bus Rev 1996;74: 75-85.
9. Fontela E, Gabus A. Current Perceptions of the World Problematique. In: Churchman CW, Mason RO, ed. World Modelling: A Dialogue. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company; 1976.
10. Tamura H, Akazawa K. Stochastic DEMATEL for struc-tural modeling of a complex problematique for realizing safe, secure and reliable society. J Telecommun Inform 2005;4:139-46. [DOI:10.9746/sicetr1965.41.358]
11. Banker RD, Charnes A, Cooper WW. Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Manage Sci 1984; 30:1078-1092 [DOI:10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078]
12. Hosseinzadeh Lotfi F, Navabakhs M, Tehranian, A, Rostamy-Malkhalifeh M, et al. Ranking bank branches with interval data the application of DEA. International Mathematical Forum 2007;2: 429-440. [DOI:10.12988/imf.2007.07039]
13. Barzegarinegad A, Jahanshahloo GR, Rostamy-Malkhalifeh M. A full ranking for decision making units using ideal and anti-ideal points in DEA. Sci World J 2014:1-8. [DOI:10.1155/2014/282939]
14. Soleimanidamaneh M. Fuzzy upper bounds and their applications. Chaos Solitons Fractals 2008;186:786-800.
15. Medori D, Steeple D. A framework for auditing and enhancing performance measurement systems. Int J Oper Prod 2000;20: 520-33. [DOI:10.1108/01443570010318896]
16. The Blackwell Ethics in Medicine. University of Washington, School of Medicine:1998.
17. Rhodes R, Francis LP, Silver A. The Blackwell Guide to Medical Ethics. Philadelphia: Blackwell publishing; 2007. [DOI:10.1111/b.9781405125840.2006.00002.x]
18. Schneide Gregor W, Snell L. C.A.R.E. An approach for teaching ethics in medicine. Soc sci Med 2000; 51:1563-67. [DOI:10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00054-X]
19. Charon R, Fox RC. Critiques and remedies: medical students call for change in ethics teaching. JAMA 1995;274:767, 771. [DOI:10.1001/jama.274.9.767]
20. Martinez SA. Reforming medical ethics education. J Law Med Ethics 2002;30:452-4. [DOI:10.1111/j.1748-720X.2002.tb00415.x]
21. Huijer M, van Leeuwen E, Boenink A, Kimsma G. Medical students' cases as an empirical basis for teaching clinical ethics. Acad Med 2000;75:834-9. [DOI:10.1097/00001888-200008000-00017]
22. Asai A, Kishino M, Fukui T, Masano T. Postgraduate education in medical ethics in Japan. Med Educ 1998;32:100-4. [DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2923.1998.00171.x]
23. Miles SH, Lane LW, Bickel J, Walker RM, Cassel CK. Medical ethics education: coming of age. Acad Med 1989;64:705-14. [DOI:10.1097/00001888-198912000-00004]
24. Fox E, Arnold RM, Brody B. Medical ethics education: past, present, and future. Acad Med 1995 Sep;70:761-9. [DOI:10.1097/00001888-199509000-00013]
25. Singer PA. Recent advances. Medical ethics. BMJ 2000;321:282-5. [DOI:10.1136/bmj.321.7256.282]
26. Tysinger JW, Klonis LK, Sadler JZ, Wagner JM. Teaching ethics using small-group, problem-based learning. J Med Ethics 1997;23:315-8. [DOI:10.1136/jme.23.5.315]
27. Self DJ, Olivarez M, Baldwin DC Jr. The amount of small-group case-study discussion needed to improve moral reasoning skills of medical students. Acad Med 1998;73:521-3. [DOI:10.1097/00001888-199805000-00019]
28. Wood DF. Problem based learning. BMJ 2003;326:328-30. [DOI:10.1136/bmj.326.7384.328]
29. Jones AH. Narrative based medicine: narrative in medical ethics. BMJ 1999;318:253-6 [DOI:10.1136/bmj.318.7178.253]
30. Carson AM. That's another story: narrative methods and ethical practice. J Med Ethics 2001;27:198-202. [DOI:10.1136/jme.27.3.198]
31. Shafiee M, Saleh H. Evaluation of Strategic Performance with Fuzzy Data Envelopment Analysis. Int J Data Envelopment Analysis 2019; 7:4.
32. Shafiee M, Hosseinzadeh F, HildaSaleh L. Supply chain performance evaluation with data envelopment analysis and balanced scorecard approach. Appl Math Model 2014; 38: 21-22. [DOI:10.1016/j.apm.2014.03.023]
33. Cook WD, Hababou M, Tuenter HJ. Multicomponent efficiency measurement and shared inputs in data envelopment analysis: an application to sales and service performance in bank branches, J Product Anal 2000; 14:209-24.
34. Ghanbari S, Ardalan M, Beheshti rad R, Soltan zadeh V. Professional Ethics of Faculty Members and Their Relationship with the Quality of Higher Education. J Ethics Sci Tech 2016;10:40-50.
35. Lawson AD. What is medical ethics? Trends in Anaesthesia and Critical Care 2011;1: 3-6. [DOI:10.1016/j.cacc.2010.02.009]
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA

XML   Persian Abstract   Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Golrizkhatami M, Shafiee M, Kazemi A. Designing a hospital performance evaluation model based on qualitative components (A case study of Shiraz Hospitals based on professional ethics). MEDICAL SCIENCES 2023; 33 (4) :414-425
URL: http://tmuj.iautmu.ac.ir/article-1-2102-en.html
Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 33, Issue 4 (winter 2023) Back to browse issues page
فصلنامه علوم پزشکی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد پزشکی تهران Medical Science Journal of Islamic Azad Univesity - Tehran Medical Branch
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645