[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Aims& Scopes
Journal News
Articles archive::
Current Issue
All Issues
For Authors::
Call for Papers
Submission Instruction
Submission Form
For Reviewers::
Reviewers Section
Registration::
Registration Information
Registration Form
Contact us::
Contact Information
Contact us
Site Facilities::
Site map
Search contents
FAQ
Top 10 contents
Inform to friends
Webmail::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 32, Issue 4 (winter 2022) ::
MEDICAL SCIENCES 2022, 32(4): 445-453 Back to browse issues page
Nursing students satisfaction with peer group clinical teaching
Shiva Salehi1 , Samaneh Parchehbafieh2 , Soheila Mashoof2 , Mahboubeh Safavi3 , Mehrandokht Nekavand 4
1- Assistant Professor, Department of Nursing, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2- Instructor, Department of Nursing, College of Nursing and Midwifery, Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
3- Associate Professor, Department of Health and Medical Services Management, Faculty of Health, Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
4- Instructor, Department of Midwifery, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran , mnakavand@hotmail.com
Abstract:   (1388 Views)
Background: Clinical education is one of the effective strategies for achieving clinical competence in nursing students. It has been found that clinical training with peer assisted learning method engages students in clinical teaching and learning and improves their psychomotor skills as well. The goal of this study was the evaluation of nursing students’ satisfaction with peer group clinical teaching method.
Materials and methods: This quasi experimental study has been carried out on 71 internship and trainee students whom were randomly selected in two intervention and control groups in hospitals related to Islamic Azad University of medical sciences. The trainee students were trained by internship students in intervention group, while control group were taught by instructors. At the end of course, satisfaction questionnaire was completed by all students in both groups. The validity and reliability of the questionnaire were confirmed by content validity and test-re- test respectively. Data analysis were done by SPSS-ver16 softwarw. P<0.05 was considered as significant.
Results: The data analysis showed that the mean and standard deviation of satisfaction score in both internship (76.16± 12.62) and trainee (76.33±13.96) students in intervention group was significantly higher than control group (66.85±15.48 in internship and 65.25±16.23 in trainee) (p=0.001).
Conclusion: Peer assisted learning method increases the student satisfaction and could be used as a part of educational program.
 
Keywords: Satisfaction, Peer group, Clinical teaching
Full-Text [PDF 305 kb]   (802 Downloads)    
Semi-pilot: Quazi-Experimental | Subject: Educational management
Received: 2022/04/30 | Accepted: 2022/06/8 | Published: 2022/12/31
References
1. Owen A., Ward-Smith P,Collaborative learning in nursing simulation. near-peer teaching using standardized patients. Journal of Nursing Education 2014;53(3): 170-3
2. DOI: 10.3928/01484834-20140219-04
3. PapathanasiouI V, Tsaras K, Sarafis P,.Views and perceptions of nursing students on their clinical learning environment: Teaching and learning. Nurse Education Today 2014; 34, 1 :57-60. [DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2013.02.007]
4. Yates P,Cunningham J, Moyle W, et al. Peer mentorship in clinical education :outcomes of a pilot programme for first year students. Nurse education today 1997;17(6):508-14. [DOI:10.1016/S0260-6917(97)80013-5]
5. Menezes S, Premnath D. Near-peer education: a novel teaching program. Int J Med Educ 2016; 7:160-7 . doi: 10.5116/ijme.5738.3c28
6. Henning JM, Weidner TG, Marty MC. Peer assisted learning in clinical education: literature review. Athletic Trainind Education Journal. 2008;3(3):84-90
8. Stone R, Cooper S, Cant R .The Value of Peer Learning in Undergraduate Nursing Education: A Systematic Review . ISRN Nursing. 2013; (1):930901.
10. Andrew J,Bbatchelder E, Chartene Mc et al. The role of students as teachers :Four years experience of a large-scale,peer –led programme .Medical Teacher 2010;(32)7:547-51.
11. DOI: 10.3109/0142159x.2010.490861
12. Yu T-C, Leman DP, Henning MA et al. General surgical interns contributing to the clerk ship learning environment of medical students. Medical Teacher 2013;35(8):639-647.
13. DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2013.801550
14. 9 -Secomb J. A systematic review of peer teaching and learning in clinical education. Journal of Clinical Nursing 2008;17(6):703-16. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.01954.x
15. Dennison S. Peer mentoring: untapped potential. Journal of Nursing Education 2010; 49 (6):340–342. [DOI:10.3928/01484834-20100217-04]
16. Christiansen A, Bell A. Peer learning partnerships: Exploring the experience of pre-registration nursing students. Journal of Clinical Nursing 2010;19( 5-6): 803-810.
18. Webel AR, Okonsky J,Trompeta Jet al. A Systematic Review of the Effectiveness of Peer-Based Interventions on Health-Related Behaviors in Adults. Am j Public Health 2010; 100(2):247-253.
19. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.149419
20. Brannagan KB, Dellinger A, Thomas J, Mitchell D, Lewis-Trabeaux S, Dupre S. Impact of peer teaching on nursing students: perceptions of learning environment, self-efficacy, and knowledge. Nurse Education 2013;33(11):1440-7
21. Glynn LG, Macfarlane A,Kelly M, Cantillon P,Murphy AW.Helping each other to learn –a process evaluation of peer assisted learning. BMC Med Educ 2006;Mar6(18):18.
22. Boyle J ,Mattern Co, Lassiter JW. Peer 2 Peer: Efficacy of a Course-Based Peer Education Intervention to Increase Physical Activity Among College Students. Journal of American college health 2011; 59(6): 519-29. DOI: 10.1080/07448481.2010.523854
23. Rengier F, Ruch PJ, Partovi S et al. A three-day anatomy revision course taught by senior peers effectively prepares junior students for their national anatomy exam. Annals of Anatomy 2010;192(6):396-399. [DOI:10.1016/j.aanat.2010.02.008]
24. Robinson Z ,Hazelgrove planel E,Edwards Z et al. Peer-assisted learning: A planning and implementation framework. Guide supplement 30.7 – Practical application. Medical Teachers 2010; 32(9):366-8. [DOI:10.3109/01421590903505679]
25. Eslami Akbar R, Hojat M, Badiyepeymaie Jahromi Z. Comparison of teaching through peer learning with the lecture method on the learning level of anesthesiology students at Jahrom University of Medical Sciences in 2013. JNE 2015; 4(3): 56-65. [Full Text in Persian]
26. Safari M, Yazdanpanah B, Islam-Nik PS. Comparison of Midwifery Students Satisfaction with the Teaching of Gynecology and Infertility by Lecture and Peer Education. Armaghane-danesh 2019; 23(6): 722-736. [Full Text in Persian]
27. Buckley S,Zamora J. Effects of participation in a cross year peer tutoring programme in clinical examination skills on volunteer tutors' skills and attitudes towards teachers and teaching. BMC Med Educ 2007; 7(20):1-9. [DOI:10.1186/1472-6920-7-20]
28. Adib-Hajbaghery M, Rafiee S. Comparing the effectiveness of group discussion and lecture methods on the learning of medical sciences students: a review study. Iranian Journal of Medical Education 2016; 16: 53-62
29. Jafari Rad A, Azizi Shamami M, Karafestani Z. Studying postgraduates’ satisfaction level about quality services offered by Tehran state-run universities. Iranian Journal of Engeneering Education 2016; 17( 68): 113-125.[ Full Text in Persian]
30. 23 -Wagner M, Mileder LP et al. Student peer teaching in paediatric simulation training is a feasible low caost alternative for education. Acta Paediatrica 2017;106(6):995-1000. [DOI:10.1111/apa.13792]
31. Thomson P, Smith A, Annesley S. Exploration of the effects of peer teaching of research on students in an undergraduate nursing programme. Journal of Research in Nursing 2014; 19 (5): 415-430 [DOI:10.1177%2F1744987113519444]
32. Lahti M , Hatonen H ,Valimaki M.Impact of e-learning on nurses’ and student nurses knowledge, skills, and satisfaction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of Nursing studies 2014;51(1):136-149
33. Momeni Danaei S ,Zarshenas L, Oshagh M et al. Which method of teaching would be better cooporative or lecture?. Iranian journal of medical education 2011;11(1):24-31. [Full Text in Persian]
34. Gotllieb Z, Epstein S, Richards J. Near‐peer teaching programme for medical students. The clinical teacher 2017;14(3):164-9. [DOI:10.1111/tct.12540]
35. Buscher R, Weber D, Buscher A et al. Evaluation of peer teaching program at university children’s hospital-Essen a single center experience. GMS Zeitschriftfur Medizinische Ausbildung2013; 30( 2):1-20. DOI: 10.3205/zma000868
36. Motevasselian M, Nasirian K. Impact of near peer teaching on learning dressing skill among nursing student. Iranian Journal of Medical Education 2014;14 (8):670-676.[ Full Text in Persian]
37. Rashid M, Sobowale O,Gore D. A near- peer teaching program designed, developed and delivered exclusively by recent medical graduate for final year medical students sitting the final objective structured clinical examination(OSCE). BMC Medical Education 2011; 11(1):11.
38. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6920-11-11
39. Keshavarzi Z, Akbari H ,Frouzanian S. Comparison of Students Satisfaction of Traditional and Integrated teaching method in physiology course. EDUCATIONAL STRATEGIES 2016;8(6):21-7. [Full Text in Persian]
40. Owen A, Ward-Smith P. Collaborative learning in nursing simulation. near-peer teaching using standardized patients. J Nurs Educ 2014;53: 170-3.
41. PapathanasiouI V, Tsaras K, Sarafis P. Views and perceptions of nursing students on their clinical learning environment: Teaching and learning. Nurse Educ Today 2014; 34:57-60.
42. Yates P, Cunningham J, Moyle W, Wollin J. Peer mentorship in clinical education: outcomes of a pilot programme for first year students. Nurse Educ Today 1997;17:508-14.
43. Menezes S, Premnath D. Near-peer education: a novel teaching program. Int J Med Educ 2016; 7:160-7.
44. Henning JM, Weidner TG, Marty MC. Peer assisted learning in clinical education: literature review. Athl Train Educ J 2008;3:84-90.
45. Stone R, Cooper S, Cant R. The value of peer learning in undergraduate nursing education: a systematic review. ISRN Nurs 2013;2013:930901.
46. Batchelder A, RodriguezC Mc, Lin L, Hickey PM, Johnson C, Elias J. The role of students as teachers: Four years experience of a large-scale,peer –led programme. Med Teach 2010;7:547-51.
47. Yu T-C, Leman DP, Henning MA, MacCormick AD, Hawken SJ, Hill AG. General surgical interns contributing to the clerk ship learning environment of medical students. Med Teach 2013;35:639-647.
48. 9 -Secomb J. A systematic review of peer teaching and learning in clinical education. J Clin Nurs 2008;17:703-16.
49. Dennison S. Peer mentoring: untapped potential. J Nurs Educ 2010; 49:340–342.
50. Christiansen A, Bell A. Peer learning partnerships: Exploring the experience of pre-registration nursing students. J Clin Nurs 2010;19: 803-810.
51. Webel AR, Okonsky J,Trompeta Jet, Holzemer WL. A Systematic Review of the Effectiveness of Peer-Based Interventions on Health-Related Behaviors in Adults. Am J Public Health 2010; 100:247-253.
52. Brannagan KB, Dellinger A, Thomas J, Mitchell D, Lewis-Trabeaux S, Dupre S. Impact of peer teaching on nursing students: perceptions of learning environment, self-efficacy, and knowledge. Nurs Educ 2013;33:1440-7.
53. Glynn LG, Macfarlane A,Kelly M, Cantillon P,Murphy AW.Helping each other to learn –a process evaluation of peer assisted learning. BMC Med Educ 2006;6:18.
54. Boyle J, Mattern Co, Lassiter JW. Peer 2 Peer: Efficacy of a Course-Based Peer Education Intervention to Increase Physical Activity Among College Students. J Am Coll Health 2011; 59: 519-29.
55. Rengier F, Ruch PJ, Partovi S, Kirsch J, Nawrotzki R. A three-day anatomy revision course taught by senior peers effectively prepares junior students for their national anatomy exam. Ann Anat 2010;192:396-399.
56. Robinson Z ,Hazelgrove planel E,Edwards Z, Siassakos D. Peer-assisted learning: A planning and implementation framework. Guide supplement 30.7 – Practical application. Med Teach 2010; 32:366-8.
57. Eslami Akbar R, Hojat M, Badiyepeymaie Jahromi Z. Comparison of teaching through peer learning with the lecture method on the learning level of anesthesiology students at Jahrom University of Medical Sciences in 2013. JNE 2015; 4: 56-65. [In Persian]
58. Safari M, Yazdanpanah B, Islam-Nik PS. Comparison of Midwifery Students Satisfaction with the Teaching of Gynecology and Infertility by Lecture and Peer Education. Armaghane-danesh 2019; 23: 722-736. [In Persian]
59. Buckley S,Zamora J. Effects of participation in a cross year peer tutoring programme in clinical examination skills on volunteer tutors' skills and attitudes towards teachers and teaching. BMC Med Educ 2007; 7:1-9.
60. Adib-Hajbaghery M, Rafiee S. Comparing the effectiveness of group discussion and lecture methods on the learning of medical sciences students: a review study. Iran J Med Educ 2016; 16: 53-62. [In Persian]
61. Jafari Rad A, Azizi Shamami M, Karafestani Z. Studying postgraduates’ satisfaction level about quality services offered by Tehran state-run universities. Iran J Eng Educ 2016; 17: 113-125. [In Persian]
62. 23 -Wagner M, Mileder LP, Goeral K, Klebermass-Schrehof K, Cardona FS, Berger A et al. Student peer teaching in paediatric simulation training is a feasible low caost alternative for education. Acta Paediatrica 2017;106:995-1000.
63. Thomson P, Smith A, Annesley S. Exploration of the effects of peer teaching of research on students in an undergraduate nursing programme. Nurs Res 2014; 19: 415-430.
64. Lahti M, Hatonen H, Valimaki M. Impact of e-learning on nurses’ and student nurses knowledge, skills, and satisfaction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Nurs Stud. 2014; 51:136-49.
65. Momeni Danaei S, Zarshenas L, Oshagh M, Omid Khoda SM. Which method of teaching would be better cooporative or lecture? Iran J Med educ 2011;11:24-31. [In Persian]
66. Gotllieb Z, Epstein S, Richards J. Near‐peer teaching programme for medical students. Clin Teach 2017; 14:164-9.
67. Büscher R, Weber D, Büscher A, Hölscher M, Pohlhuis S, Groes B, et al. Evaluation of the peer teaching program at the University Children´s Hospital Essen - a single center experience. GMS Z Med Ausbild 2013; 30:25.
68. Motevasselian M, Nasirian K. Impact of near peer teaching on learning dressing skill among nursing student. Iran J Med Educ 2014; 14:670-676. [In Persian]
69. Rashid M, Sobowale O,Gore D. A near- peer teaching program designed, developed and delivered exclusively by recent medical graduate for final year medical students sitting the final objective structured clinical examination(OSCE). BMC Med Educ 2011; 11:11.
70. Keshavarzi Z, Akbari H, Frouzanian S. Comparison of Students Satisfaction of Traditional and Integrated teaching method in physiology course. Educ Stra Med Sci 2016; 8:21-7. [In Persian]
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA

XML   Persian Abstract   Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Salehi S, Parchehbafieh S, Mashoof S, Safavi M, Nekavand M. Nursing students satisfaction with peer group clinical teaching. MEDICAL SCIENCES 2022; 32 (4) :445-453
URL: http://tmuj.iautmu.ac.ir/article-1-1955-en.html
Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 32, Issue 4 (winter 2022) Back to browse issues page
فصلنامه علوم پزشکی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد پزشکی تهران Medical Science Journal of Islamic Azad Univesity - Tehran Medical Branch
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.06 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4660